The declaration of a state of emergency in Rivers State has sparked widespread criticism, with notable voices like Professor Pat Utomi condemning the move.
Utomi argues that the National Assembly’s endorsement of President Bola Tinubu’s decision undermines democracy and represents an affront to the Nigerian people.
- Heavyweight boxing great George Foreman dead at 76
- Ruben Dias back for Ronaldo-led Portugal against Denmark
According to him, such measures indicate a lack of regard for democratic institutions and set a dangerous precedent for governance in the country.
He further noted that the political crisis in Rivers State should be resolved through dialogue and legal means rather than resorting to extreme measures such as an emergency rule.
Utomi stressed that democratic governments should not suppress opposition or stifle political participation under the guise of maintaining order.
Many analysts and opposition figures share similar sentiments, insisting that the crisis should be handled through peaceful negotiations.
The Rivers State government has also expressed strong opposition to the move, with Governor Siminalayi Fubara calling it an unconstitutional act.
In his statement, the governor emphasized that the crisis in the state does not warrant such an extreme response.
He urged the federal government to allow political processes to take their course without undue interference.
Several civil society organizations, including the Socio-Economic Rights and Accountability Project (SERAP), have threatened to take legal action against the federal government if the emergency rule is enforced.
They argue that Nigeria’s constitution provides mechanisms for resolving political disputes without resorting to drastic actions.
Many fear that this decision could worsen the political tensions in the region.
Despite the outcry, the federal government has defended its decision, stating that it aims to restore order and prevent further instability.
Presidential spokespersons insist that the security situation in Rivers State justifies the emergency rule, even as critics maintain that such interventions are politically motivated.
The coming weeks will determine whether the government moves forward with this controversial measure or bows to pressure from stakeholders.